Is Vancouver's Share Kinda Sus? Employees Saying It's Setting People Up to Fail 😬

The Deets

Okay, fam, so Share in Vancouver is this huge org that's supposed to be helping people experiencing homelessness. They've been around since the 70s, slinging out shelter, housing, and all that jazz. But, word on the street is, things ain't looking too great behind the scenes.

Current and ex-employees are spilling the tea, saying they're drowning in work, got mad high caseloads, and the staff turnover is chronic. Like, people are dipping left and right. They're also saying there's hella pressure to house people ASAP just to hit those funding goals. But here's the kicker – some are claiming this rush job is low-key setting clients up for failure, and they end up back on the streets after leaving the program. That's a major L if you ask me.

Share's management is fighting back, saying, "Hold up, it's rough out here! Homelessness is skyrocketing in Clark County, and we're doing what we can with the bread we got." They're also blaming federal regs for making it harder to place clients. Fair enough, but the drama doesn't stop there.

Financially, Share's budget has blown up, going from $7 million in 2015 to a projected $15 million in 2025. Caseloads per worker have actually decreased over time, but employees still say it's a struggle. And the workplace culture? Some are calling it straight-up toxic, saying there's a lack of support and accountability. A bunch of employees even said they've been dealing with mental health issues because of the job. That's sus.

The board is trying to fix things, supposedly. They've bumped up wages and started a retention committee. They're even planning to bring in outsiders to check out Share's whole vibe. Some clients are stoked about the support they're getting, but others feel like Share just doesn't have the resources to help them level up. So, is Share actually helping, or is it just another L system? The jury's still out on that one, fam.