Climate Change: Fr fr no cap, Why Aren't We Seeing It?

The Deets

Okay, so peep this: climate change is like, a major vibe kill, right? But sometimes it feels like we're not even seeing the real deal. Like, the photos we get are kinda... meh. That's why photographers are stepping up their game, tryna find new ways to show us what's going down. They're experimenting with the feels, tryna hit us right in the feels.

They're getting real personal with it too, sharing stories from local communities. Because let's be real, seeing how climate change affects actual people? That hits different. We're talking rising sea levels, coral bleaching, wildfires, the whole shebang. It's not just about the big picture, it's about how it's messing with everyday life.

Photographers like Daniel Schwartz and Pat Kane are out here doing the work, showing us the realness of rising sea levels and wildfire evacuations. It's heavy stuff, but it's important to see. Editors, art directors, and curators need to realize that the world needs help to harness the power of photography. If not we will not be able to evoke emotion and empathy, helping us understand the urgency and existential nature of the crisis we find ourselves in.

But here's where it gets kinda sus. Some peeps are calling out climate change NGOs, saying they're being extra. There's this report from the Canadian Climate Institute saying we need government to step in and tell us where to build houses, because climate change is gonna mess things up. But some people are like, "Hold up, are these projections even legit?" They're saying the data is shaky, and that maybe we should be able to make our own choices about where we wanna live.

They're saying the models they use aren't even that accurate, and that there are other factors to consider, like forest management. It's a whole debate, tbh. Are these NGOs just tryna control us? Or are they actually looking out for our best interests? It's hard to say, but it's def something to think about.